<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>ChatGPT on Rinsland&#39;s Corner</title>
		<link>https://rinsland.net/category/chatgpt/</link>
		<description>Recent content in ChatGPT on Rinsland&#39;s Corner</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-US</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 23:03:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://rinsland.net/category/chatgpt/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>ChatGPT&#39;s Most Influential Rock Songs of the 21st Century</title>
				<link>https://rinsland.net/posts/2026/chatgpts-21st-century-rock-list/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 23:03:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<guid>https://rinsland.net/posts/2026/chatgpts-21st-century-rock-list/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;I got mad at the Rolling Stone&amp;rsquo;s Top 200 Rock Songs of the 21st Century, and it was so bad I knew immediately that an AI could probably do better. So I asked ChatGPT to give me a blog article giving me just the Top 100 Most Impactful Rock of the 21st Century. The only other valid criteria for measuring music would be popularity, but that&amp;rsquo;d just be a list built from charts and I don&amp;rsquo;t think Rolling Stone did that either. Turns out, AI is definitely better than Rolling Stone and it&amp;rsquo;s not even particularly close. Everything below was generated entirely by ChatGPT 6 Chat on Medium thinking.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
